I've checked the OUYA object, it's outdated on my machine too, I'll check with Fernando on Monday. In the meantime please ignore this error message.
PS: are you sure you need the OUYA object? IIRC nobody uses OUYA anymore.
Don't have an account yet? Then register once and completely free of charge and use our wide range of topics, features and great options. As a registered member on our site, you can use all functions to actively participate in community life. Write posts, open topics, upload your pictures, put your videos online, talk to other members and help us to constantly improve our project and grow together! So, what are you waiting for? Become a part of us today!
Login or registerTo get support for a technical issue such as installing the software, to query a purchase that you've made/would like to make, or anything other than using our software, please visit our Customer Service Desk:
Open a TicketI've checked the OUYA object, it's outdated on my machine too, I'll check with Fernando on Monday. In the meantime please ignore this error message.
PS: are you sure you need the OUYA object? IIRC nobody uses OUYA anymore.
I found a case where the collisions do not work properly.
Apparently the Easing object doesn't tell the runtime to trigger the "immediate" condition "Collision between X and Y" for the objects it moves, I'll ask Anders if it's intended or if this should be fixed. In the meantime you can use the Is Overlapping condition, this one will work.
O_o It's TTF files on my machine, where did you see it's OTF files?
Please login to see this attachment.
Screenshot showing Arial as an Open Type - Tahoma displays as an Open Type as well.
I've checked the OUYA object, it's outdated on my machine too, I'll check with Fernando on Monday. In the meantime please ignore this error message.
PS: are you sure you need the OUYA object? IIRC nobody uses OUYA anymore.
Thank you so much [MENTION=5114]Yves[/MENTION]. Much appreciate your time answering and checking this.
Actually, I thought that I need the OUYA object in the frame in order to make the game playable on Android devices in terms of the control (my game is set to be controlled with the D-Pad). But then I realized that I don't need it as I just had to set the "Player Control" to "Input Device 1", and to make the movement conditions related to the "Player 1" object (Joystick -> Read Joystick State -> and to pick a direction or fire button as needed).
I found a case where the collisions do not work properly.
Yves' suggestion of using is overlapping is probably the simplest solution. You can combine it with only once when event loops so it only checks once per collision, which is more performant and closer to what Collision between does.
You probably know all this already, but just in case, I'll mention that there are a couple of other things you can do to get around this bug and still use Collision between. One is to use the Easing object more indirectly, by easing some values first, and then applying those values to the object's movement. That's how I do it in my game. You do this with the EaseInBetween expression:
Please login to see this picture.
In the case of your example, it would look something like this:
Please login to see this picture.
Another option is to use the Please login to see this link., which gives you similar functionality to the Easing Object but without using any extensions (it does all the math with regular Fusion code that's hidden 'under the hood' in the widget's behaviours).
Please login to see this attachment.
Screenshot showing Arial as an Open Type - Tahoma displays as an Open Type as well.
Interesting, yes I see this also. But when you copy the fonts to another folder it saves TTF files, that's why I though it was TTF fonts. OpenType is derived from TrueType, apparently the library we use support it too.
Display MoreYves' suggestion of using is overlapping is probably the simplest solution. You can combine it with only once when event loops so it only checks once per collision, which is more performant and closer to what Collision between does.
You probably know all this already, but just in case, I'll mention that there are a couple of other things you can do to get around this bug and still use Collision between. One is to use the Easing object more indirectly, by easing some values first, and then applying those values to the object's movement. That's how I do it in my game. You do this with the EaseInBetween expression:
Please login to see this picture.
In the case of your example, it would look something like this:
Please login to see this picture.
Another option is to use the Please login to see this link., which gives you similar functionality to the Easing Object but without using any extensions (it does all the math with regular Fusion code that's hidden 'under the hood' in the widget's behaviours).
In fact, I solved it much easier because I don't have to check for collisions - It was just an option. Anyway, I just wanted to inform you that there is such a case and that's it.
I have a question, why in the list editor I can change the tested object by double-clicking on the object icon in the condition, but not in action? This means that when I want to replace an object, I have to rewrite the entire action or drag an icon from another action, but it is not always in sight and you need to create a new action.
Another solution could be to also use the move safely object which flags collisions.
Easing object only repositions your active object.
Created a game using the latest build.
This is from windows defender
Please login to see this attachment.
it automatically removed the game
I created a blank application and uploaded it to virustotal. (F2.5+ dev, latest version)
Please login to see this link.
13/71 detected it as malware, wow.
checks-user-input
direct-cpu-clock-access
invalid-rich-pe-linker-version
overlay
peexe
runtime-modules
For me, CF2.5 + gives a completely different result. Are you sure your computer is clean and the file is not catching it on the fly?
[MENTION=5114]Yves[/MENTION]
I use Windows XP 32 bit as development system.
Can I do the update, or will Fusion 2.5+ not work on Windows XP 32 bit?
R292.22 Works great with Windows XP 32 bit.
This is probably because ctrl + s pauses the music and then Fusion treats it as still playing, so that event then never becomes true. You'd have to do something else - like add in (or) sample is paused or a countdown. (I had queried, this before, myself.)
@Please login to see this link.
I use Windows XP 32 bit as development system.
Can I do the update, or will Fusion 2.5+ not work on Windows XP 32 bit?R292.22 Works great with Windows XP 32 bit.
Yes, it will - the issue was fixed with 292.29 - in any event, you can try it, and if there's a problem you could reinstall any of the previous versions from the Product Owner's Lounge again.
I created a blank application and uploaded it to virustotal. (F2.5+ dev, latest version)
Please login to see this link.
13/71 detected it as malware, wow.
Yeah, it went worse this week-end, and yesterday it was 28... so actually 13 is a progress. Some of them haven't answered my messages yet, and one or 2 are new, I'll contact them too.
I updated from version 292.27 to 292.29 and Kaspersky gave me a false positive again.Please login to see this attachment.
I can't see your attachment, for what file is it? Kaspersky told me it was fixed and from what I saw on Virustotal it seems true, is it up-to-date on your machine?
I'm sorry. I don't really know how to use it...
Please login to see this attachment.
OK, so it's with a built application. I'll do other tests.
So much time lost with those AV programs...
PS: there is probably an option to submit the file to Kaspersky as false positive in the interface, could you do it and mention it was made with Clickteam Fusion 2.5 please? Everything could help...
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!
Almightyzentaco (Fusion 2.5 Tutorials)
Captain Quail (Firefly Tutorials)