Problem with object scoping

Welcome to our brand new Clickteam Community Hub! We hope you will enjoy using the new features, which we will be further expanding in the coming months.

A few features including Passport are unavailable initially whilst we monitor stability of the new platform, we hope to bring these online very soon. Small issues will crop up following the import from our old system, including some message formatting, translation accuracy and other things.

Thank you for your patience whilst we've worked on this and we look forward to more exciting community developments soon!

Clickteam.

    I have a problem with object scoping (at least I think that's the term I'm looking for).

    Please login to see this attachment.

    If you walk on top of multiple blocks to hide them and then keep standing on top of one, they all remain hidden until you move away, even though only the one you're on top of should remain hidden. I'm not a Fusion expert by any means, but as far as I've understood, the first condition ("IncrVal of Block Outline >= 0") should specify which block to keep hidden.

    Swap the order of the overlapping objects in event #4, as I've highlighted below.

    When two objects are compared in a condition, Fusion usually scopes from the one on the left, which is one of its idiosyncrasies. Sometimes this kind of makes sense logically, though in this example I guess it probably feels quite arbitrary.


    Please login to see this picture.

    Please login to see this link.
    My Fusion Tools: Please login to see this link. | Please login to see this link. | Please login to see this link.

    Edited once, last by Volnaiskra (May 27, 2023 at 2:44 AM).

    Quote from Volnaiskra

    Swap the order of the overlapping objects in event #4, as I've highlighted below.

    When two objects are compared in a condition, Fusion usually scopes from the one on the left, which is one of its idiosyncrasies. Sometimes this kind of makes sense logically, though in this example I guess it probably feels quite arbitrary.


    Please login to see this picture.


    I'm disappointed in myself for not even thinking of trying that. It's so obvious in hindsight. Anyway, thanks a lot.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login