Vitalized extensions

"Thinking" about it Fano.
Where is it stated that Vitalized is being dropped?

Marv

I think Vitalize would be better put on hold than dropped altogether - after all the other exporters are finished then Vitalize should attention again. I do not want to see the end to it - for even the simplest things it is faster than flash or java and CT has full control over it to do whatever they wish with it. Of course this is up to CT to decide and I am simply stating my opinion here.

Vitalize! shouldn't be dropped. It should be ported for Mac/Linux/Unix, etc. I think all the exporter making business is a waste of time, honestly. Why can't we just port Vitalize! for mac/linux/unix/iOs and stop paying 100s of dollars on stuff we can't even use (iOs exporter=rip-off, you need to pay 1,000s of dollars for a mac, then $99 a year just to publish your apps to the app store.)

While it does seem that the world is running towards the hand held apps, my guess is that will slow down and many people will still spend time on their old reliable and usefull for everything desktops and laptops.

And Flash may be really popular now, but most would agree that it's a pain to use and something will be taking it's place. Trying to get apps on Apple is a pain and expensive.

Vitalize, even after being totally ignored, still is easier to use and allows the use of many more extensions without workarounds, bugs, and hassles.

My suggestion would be for Click Team to continue to develop Vitalize but sell it as an add on to help defray the cost of its development. I certainly would pay the same price as the Flash add-on to have Vitalize for use in the future.

Steve Hughes