[Beta] Tween Max

It might be easier for some if you included the swc file with your extension.

Very nice extension!

StephenL, I think you have the right idea. That site is a mess and I couldn't find it. What say ye Pharanygitis?

Marv

Thanks a bunch.

Marv

Ah, I misunderstood that this object is possible to tweeting. :blush:
Nice extension!

Very useful extension thanks

This is based on greensock tweenmax though right, you don't say this anywhere and should probably put some sort of license note like StephenL did in some of his objects or just link to it -

Please login to see this link.

Generally there is no problem but for example this could easily be done by a MMF2 user that had some sort of online game with a subscription

Quote

The code will be used in a commercial game, web site, component, or software product for which a usage/access/license/microtransaction fee is collected from multiple customers.

Which i am guessing would mean they need to buy a Corporate Membership etc. So if extensions use library's like this they should have the license terms etc, not trying to be annoying here saying this as it avoids possible problems for people.

If this extension is based on TweenMax, then it is worth bearing in mind that it is a commercial product; it's not open source or freeware, etc.

I'm not so sure about supplying the SWC file with the MMF extension; I would think that a link to obtain it from the Greensock site would be more appropriate.

I think it would be a good idea to get in touch with Jack Doyle of Greensock to ensure that he is happy with the software being used in this way.

He's a cool guy, so I don't see that he will have a problem with it, as long as appropriate credits and licensing information are provided.

And why it can't be included in package with extension?

And cannot you put a popup with each placing of the object in the frame with licence, and that you have to agree to it if you want to use it?

No. That would be incredibly obtrusive.

I like Fano's idea.

I agree. Better than the newer forum members (and me) having to go and dig around on a website to get extra material. +1 for popup with licence.

Marv

This library has license terms and commercial part so having a popup is a lot better than having no notice/info about it and people breaking license terms without even knowing it. There is also the fact that it's using a library which someone else coded and they should get credit for that.

Popups are fine as long as they don't show to people playing the games which they won't if done correctly. In fact StephenL already uses this method in some flash extensions that use library's and it works well.

For example some of Z33z objects got that and it was quite common with other objects as well (back in MMF 1.5 days) because it's not information for end users but developers which will accept it.

I think that would be best, and get the extension changed so that our energies can be for improvement for the extension mechanics. If done as a popup, all the bases are covered.

Marv

I'll admit that a popup would be nicer, but I'd take a one time deal over having it appear every single time I drop it in.

I'd prefer to just use the Easing Object for flash (If it would come out already) Seems simpler and no licensing issues.