Issue #2: Background color problem... unveiled!
Francois, I was able to reproduce the background color problem:
[image]http://giovanni.cardona.com/gpx/BGCOLORerror.gif[/image]
I created a 32768 empty application, changed the background color to #0080c0, then, the java mfa runtime shifted the Red with the Blue register to #c08000
I will work with the Sound problems this weekend.
Re: Issue #2: Background color problem... unveiled!
The color problem is already corrected.
Can you send me the offset problem in an application? Just leave the quickbackground objects... I think I corrected it, but I want to be sure.
Thanks
Building EXE in build 248
I can build Java Applets in beta Build #248 but .EXE builds dont run in my machine. Is this normal?
Re: Building EXE in build 248
Yves, have you had a report on that?
Re: Building EXE in build 248
Re: Building EXE in build 248
Hello Yves.
I can confirm, that my #247 EXE's works fine, but my #248 EXE's dont run (no output, no errors)
(edited: just noticed that Autobackup doesnt work in #248)
Testing: Build 247 on WinXP SP2 - NTFS5
Testing: Build 248 on Win2000 SP4 - Fat32 Partition
Testing: Multimedia Fusion 2 - STANDARD Version
Can't Mouse Click on Active Objects
Hello Francois;
I am not able to click on an Active Object in build #248
(when running on an Applet)
Re: Can't Mouse Click on Active Objects
What do you mean, click on an object? The condition Click on object does not work? Does the mouse work (like click condition, xmouse and ymouse)?
Re: Can't Mouse Click on Active Objects
Mouse x,y conditions works fine.
but Mouse click on Active Object doesnt work.
Re: Can't Mouse Click on Active Objects
Francois, you can use the same example I submited in the MMF2 Tech Support Forum for the Layer bug;
http://giovanni.ipresent2u.com/layerbug.mfa
This example doesnt work at all in an Java Applet
Re: Can't Mouse Click on Active Objects
Giovani, the click on object works fine. I have tried with app of mine and you app. What does not work in your app is the second condition that tests if layer 1 is visible. It is never true. There must be a bug there.