OINC is slower than Live Receiver?

Is this just me, or OINC HTTP Get function is slower than Live Receiver?

I'm running XAMPP on my PC. When I test both extensions, Live Receiver received the data faster than OINC.

But the only dilemma is Live Receiver has problem with Sub-Apps...it crashes when Sub-App ended while Live Receiver connecting with server.

Can you confirm this, Jamie?

OINC and Live Receiver perform HTTP GET in completely different ways.. OINC uses the same Windows functions Internet Explorer uses (also used by MMF2's auto update and the Download object) whereas Live Receiver uses a library (libcurl).