Uploaded for izac on this thread.
This: Download
Is a CPU tester which can accurately measure multicore systems.
Also interested in results and computer specs.
Score 55.45 here on my core i7 ;)
Printable View
56.37
pretty neat
I got 69.44 without closing any other programs. :D
30 something :(
18.82
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Hm, do you think this test is that accurate after all?
I got 42.31 on an old Q6600 with lots of programs open... I also have an i5 but I can't access it right now.
Pkeod, i7-965 Extreme overclocked to 4 ghz?
71.7 without closing any other programs :P
With my AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition:
Scored 53.98 @ 3.2Ghz (no OC)
56.81 @ 3.4Ghz Multiplier X 17.0
57.6 @ 3.5Ghz Multiplier X 17.5
59.76 @ 3.6Ghz Multiplier X 18.0
22.2, I don't even know what processor I have. :cry:
-Variant
variant* The test should tell you on the opening page.
Thanks for the results guys!
Looki* Going by what Locaz00 has said:
53.98 @ 3.2Ghz
56.81 @ 3.4Ghz
57.6 @ 3.5Ghz
59.76 @ 3.6Ghz
The test seems fairly accurate :P
Yeah, well done SEELE!
PD: a shame that my system halted with the "blue screen of dead", after set it at 3.7Ghz...^^
SEELE, what i7 do you have? I'm just wondering because your score doesn't seem to be very high compared to others. :)
Yeah i noticed :P...
My mother board had put restrictions on it for what ever reason.
It's performing much faster now 75.33 :wink:
860 (octo-core) 2.4ghz
OMG!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by SEELE
I bet my dual core 3.01 GHz outperforms it for most tasks :P
Where in the world do you get octo-core computers from! How many cores can your computer have?!?
-Variant
Dual quad xeons?Quote:
Originally Posted by SEELE
@variant as many as you want. Usually for lots you need to string multiple processors together. And they work better in powers of 2.
Intresting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacob
-Variant
dual core 2MHz which has been hurting: 6.97 O_o
Okay, 53.13 on the i5.
and your programs' multithreading would have to support it, too. Not really impressive to have an octo-core if everything runs on just one of them :SQuote:
Originally Posted by Jacob
I think he has 8 cores via hyper-threading which the i7 series supports. Anyway, you can also run two or more programs at the same time without a slow down, even if one of the core's usage is at 100%.
52.81 - Q9450 @ 2.6ghz
I dont know what this score means, but im guessing its ok
So you can have as many cores as you want, but the limit of them is still restricted as one program can not run a bit of itself on too many cores?Quote:
Originally Posted by Looki
-Thanks, Variant
@ Variant, pretty much. Unless an application is programmed to utilise multiple cores, having many cores is (currently) a bit uselss in my opinion. The main core of a program can really only run on 1 core otherwise if it splits over several then data processed by one core could modify data being processed by another core which can really mess tings up. basically multiple cores is useful if the application can assign non vital processes to a different core, which gives it more time to focus on other things. As long as the processing of the additional core/s doesnt modify any data being used the primary one its fine.
Oh, so having too many cores isn't neccessary then.
-Thanks, Variant
The other thing to realise is that in general more then one program (and certainly more then one windows service) is running at any one time.
That combined with an automatic affinity control makes multiple cpu cores allways a great overall speed increase :P
multiple cores are defiantely better, but just arn't used to thier full potential yetQuote:
Originally Posted by variant