html5 exporter and intel XDK and other app containers

Sorry if this has been asked in the past, but does the html5 exporter support "intel XdK" or any other container to make an app from a html5 exported game from mmf?

I get it that the performance wont be native, but is it possible to actually put up an html5 exported mmf game on the app store or on google play store (android phones)?

Is there a tutorial out there somewhere on how to package and html5 game for android and ios?
Any possible problems with input?

I wonder if it's worth investing in it at all.
Thanks in advance..

I have successfully run the HTML5 Runtime in Cordova on an iPad and iPhone, but it takes modifying the runtime slightly to get it to load, so its entirely possible,
I will have to do it again, and post how as soon as I get the time.

Yes, a step-by-step tutorial on how to achieve this would be great.

Alright, found and made the changes necessary to allows apps to run in Cordova/Phonegap, but its a process, I will write a tut when I get a chance,

thank you very much! Please share it here when it is ready. I am really eager to try it out :)

so there is technically no way of doing it. Not officially.

so has anyone figured out a way to do it? If not, then I guess construct2 is the way to go then for html5 game porting. Html5 clickteam games can not be used with xdk

I got it to work with Intel XDK once, but I forgot how I did it and it took some modifying of the code (DELETE the code that gives the "Your Browser Does Not Support Html5" error). I will look into that sometime.

I will not buy the html5 exporter until clickteam developers pull their pants up and make a fix to the exporter that is on par with the competition - work both with XdK and nw.js out of the box.
Until then the exporter is not worth the money. A community fix is what this is - a hack/workaround that would probably take 5 minutes to fix in the exporter but is not happening for lack of interest.

I already have construct2 license and their engine is superior in terms of code reusal and level editing, it exports html5 much better and supports these containers out of the box. Also scirra does not require you to pay another 400$ to have ads in your game and ingame purchases. That stuff is free even in the free version. Not to mention that the actual personal license of construct2- the entire game engine - costs almost as much as the html5 exporter that clickteam offers here.

The more I think about it, the more clickteam's exporter pricing and limitations seem ridiculous in comparison.
What you get is still an html5 exporter that exports games that wont work with any containers - people have to hand edit and remove lines that clickteam put in there - just to get their game to play nice with "xdk".

in the end of the day they want to sell native exporters. Html5 games can be ported to android and ios via xDK (container) for free, so I would assume its in clickteam's interest that the html5 exporter creates projects that wont work out of the box with xdk and will be only good for website embedding.
This would not bother me if it could at least do nodejs/electron embedding - that would allow people to use html5 to develop games for mac and linux.
With a simple project you can manually embed your game in nodejs, but fusion's exported index file is no good for embedding in nodejs.