Build 294.14 - Release version

[Wodjanoi]

UI - design questions / request

1)
Generally it's not clear to me why this very first line/divider element directly under the Window title(see above screenshot: fuchsia color) - only pops up for the Main Toolbar if it's currently the very top row?
With the recent UI adjustments I thought now the main purpose for this horizontal divider is for the accessibility - that it is visually easier to avoid that you accidently open the general window options if you quickly plan to open |View - Toolbars →| per right click.
In this case it's a bit strange that this divider element disappears when a different Toolbar row maintains the top position, isn't it?

2)
I think it's a regress that "Toolbar blocks" are now visually separated from each other only by the "move around/detach handle".
If it's no diffcult task - could you eventually bring back the horizontal(Toolbar block's lower edge) + vertical(Toolbar block's right end) divider elements from before?
I noticed 1-2 reports of other people who can't cope with this specific change in the UI design and for one person it was the only reason to completely stay away from Build 294.3+
Why do you have actually taken this design decision I wonder? One logical reason I see could be to better show that vertical position adjustments of movable Toolbar elements/rows are allowed.
It doesn't appear of such importance to suspend the previous divider behaviour in consequence though.

[TonyThunder]

Hello, I realized something

When there are many conditions The "Action Info" appears very displaced from the position of the mark.

ActionInfoDistance.png

The greater the number of conditions the distance becomes greater, if there are many conditions the "action info" disappears from the screen

[danjo]

UI - design questions / request

1)
Generally it's not clear to me why this very first line/divider element directly under the Window title(see above screenshot: fuchsia color) - only pops up for the Main Toolbar if it's currently the very top row?
With the recent UI adjustments I thought now the main purpose for this horizontal divider is for the accessibility - that it is visually easier to avoid that you accidently open the general window options if you quickly plan to open |View - Toolbars →| per right click.
In this case it's a bit strange that this divider element disappears when a different Toolbar row maintains the top position, isn't it?

2)
I think it's a regress that "Toolbar blocks" are now visually separated from each other only by the "move around/detach handle".
If it's no diffcult task - could you eventually bring back the horizontal(Toolbar block's lower edge) + vertical(Toolbar block's right end) divider elements from before?
I noticed 1-2 reports of other people who can't cope with this specific change in the UI design and for one person it was the only reason to completely stay away from Build 294.3+
Why do you have actually taken this design decision I wonder? One logical reason I see could be to better show that vertical position adjustments of movable Toolbar elements/rows are allowed.
It doesn't appear of such importance to suspend the previous divider behaviour in consequence though.

my eyes watered when i read that, and my brain switched off... i've always and still have done up to the last update, just re organized my tool bar into a simple one that uses the features i use all the time. its completely customizable.

[endloz]

Hello! I need help!
I use fusion on a mac via wine. now in version 294.14 everything looks extremely ugly. how to return the previous view of windows and toolbars, as it was in earlier versions?

294.14 ugly
ver_294_14.jpg

292.29 beautiful
ver_292_29.jpg

pls help!

[Volnaiskra]

Hello! I need help!
I use fusion on a mac via wine. now in version 294.14 everything looks extremely ugly. how to return the previous view of windows and toolbars, as it was in earlier versions?

pls help!

Version 294 includes a new UI engine, so many parts of the interface look different. However, on your system many of the icons are clearly broken, which is not supposed to happen. 294 includes a new panel called the Skin editor toolbar, which lets you edit most aspects of the interface, so maybe try changing some things in the Skin editor toolbar and seeing if that helps.

[endloz]

Version 294 includes a new UI engine, so many parts of the interface look different. However, on your system many of the icons are clearly broken, which is not supposed to happen. 294 includes a new panel called the Skin editor toolbar, which lets you edit most aspects of the interface, so maybe try changing some things in the Skin editor toolbar and seeing if that helps.

Thanks for answer. I looked at the Skin editor toolbar, but it did not give me a positive result. Tell me please how to disable the new UI engine and return to the old view?

[Volnaiskra]

Thanks for answer. I looked at the Skin editor toolbar, but it did not give me a positive result. Tell me please how to disable the new UI engine and return to the old view?

For that, you would have to uninstall 294 and install 293. With Steam, that could be tricky, since Steam automatically updates

Try completely uninstalling and reinstalling 294 in case something was bad about the installation.

[endloz]

For that, you would have to uninstall 294 and install 293. With Steam, that could be tricky, since Steam automatically updates

Try completely uninstalling and reinstalling 294 in case something was bad about the installation.

I've reinstalled steam and fusion three times, but it doesn't help. All other versions work very well, but version 294 with the damn new UI engine looks really bad. Essentially I have to use a lame product. I know that many scolded fusion for its outdated interface, but I really liked it, it was cozy.
Why is it not possible to opt out of using this new UI engine (for example, some kind of switch in the settings)?

[danjo]

tradesman blaming the tools as usual.

[endloz]

tradesman blaming the tools as usual.

What is the use of this message?

Guys please tell me what else can be the solution to the existing problem with the interface?