Don't have an account yet? Then register once and completely free of charge and use our wide range of topics, features and great options. As a registered member on our site, you can use all functions to actively participate in community life. Write posts, open topics, upload your pictures, put your videos online, talk to other members and help us to constantly improve our project and grow together! So, what are you waiting for? Become a part of us today!
To get support for a technical issue such as installing the software, to query a purchase that you've made/would like to make, or anything other than using our software, please visit our Customer Service Desk:
Welcome to our brand new Clickteam Community Hub! We hope you will enjoy using the new features, which we will be further expanding in the coming months.
A few features including Passport are unavailable initially whilst we monitor stability of the new platform, we hope to bring these online very soon. Small issues will crop up following the import from our old system, including some message formatting, translation accuracy and other things.
Thank you for your patience whilst we've worked on this and we look forward to more exciting community developments soon!
The dotNETscript extention installer requires mmf2 or mmf2dev to be installed to install the .Net extension. A few versions of dotnet.zip file exists in the forums but they do not work. I suspect they are missing files and registry entery(ies) that are not included within these zip files.
Can anyone please supply all the files(including paths) and registey changes (if required)...thank you so much.
I prefer the author of this extension, but anyone who can do this will work.
Do you have the dotNetScriptSetup.exe dated 12 5 2009? It is for MMF2 and Developer. I can zip up both Runtime and Extension dotnet.mfx for you so you can use it on 2.5. I use it on 2.5. Marv
Marv
Question: I noticed the new zip file contents are dated 10/19/2008. Are they the same as the 12/5/2009 files in the setup.exe file?
Can you tell me where i can get this version of the dotNetScript? I am using the CTF 2.5 developer via steam, so I will need the .zipped up version if you still have it. I am working on an testing automation application using the C# version of selenium, and I want to see if this will work.
The import tool might not detect your image size or the number of frames it should import.
Since all the tiles in the first image are the same size (32 x 32 ), enter 32 for those values. The full image is 512 x 64, so there are 32 tiles in that image. Make sure the number of frames is 32.
I'm at work and I do not have access to Fusion, so I hope you can follow what I said.
I removed my post because I did not fully read yours. I do not own the dev version, but I really don't think it will improve performance, etc if you upgrade to dev.
The only way I would improve performance is to document everything that you are using:
1. extensions --- some extensions might require more resources than others that can do the same job. 2. media --- try to using different media file types or reduce samples,colors, and/or sizes. 3. Layers --- I'm new at using CTF2.5, so 'm reading a lot about the tool. I read that is you using multiple layers to handle collisions might improve performance, but this is only hearsay. 4. HWA --- You could try to use more HWA effects to take the load off the CPU, and put it on the GPU. Testing this with and without to see if there is a change.
Also, could you post your PC specs: CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
Good luck! Maybe more experienced Fusion devs could add more information.
Sorry for bringing up an old post, I just wanted to share what Matt has done when using a 90 degree rotated Hexagon.
The example Matt supplied was for the Hex Tile that has a Flat Edge on the Top and Botton sides. I decided to reverse his algorymn for a Hex Tile that was Flat Edge on the Left and Right sides.
Up and Down (Matt's) code: LeftShift=5 DownShift=9
I'm new here, but not new to programming. I just learned that arrays were a pain in Fusion 2.5 a few days back, so I appreciate your alternative method on using arrays. I just got Fusion, so I really had time to play with it. But, this will be one of the things I'll use when developing.